Legal Opinion

Sauls v. McKune

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 9, 2011No. 103,262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Prison inmates have some due-process rights when prison officials enter disciplinary sanctions against them that take away either liberty or property interests. So Keith Sauls filed a court action challenging the $20 fine and loss of good-time credits entered as a sanction against him for escaping from custody for a brief time. The district court threw out Sauls’ suit because it had not been physically served on the Secretary of Corrections within time limits applicable to most civil lawsuits. But we reverse because that time limit does not apply to prisoner habeas suits under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State v. LaturnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. McGinley v. Bank of America, N.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Taylor v. McKuneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Secretary of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Saeyiem v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Secretary, Department for Children and Families v. Estate of SandsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API