Buck v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
The parties occupy the same relative position here as in the trial court and Millard P. Buck, plaintiff in error, will therefore be referred to • herein as “plaintiff” and Robert D. Caldwell, defendant in error, will be referred to as “defendant”. When referred to collectively, plaintiff and defendant will be referred to as “partners”.
On August 26, 19S3, plaintiff and defendant were engaged as partners in the practice of architecture at Bartlesville, Oklahoma. On said date partners reached an agreement with Frank McGuire and his wife, Juanita, relative to building an office…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Dyer v. Vann Ex Rel. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Comstock v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Yahola Sand & Gravel Company v. MarxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Finley v. Concho Construction CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.