Legal Opinion

Kokernot v. Gilstrap

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1945No. A-186PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Brewster,

of the Commission of Appeals, delivered the opinion for the Court.

This is an action in trespass to try title brought by Homer Gilstrap et ux, respondents, against W. H. Kokernot et al, petitioners. A trial court judgment non obstante veredicto for respondents was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 180 S. W. (2d) 183.

After the conventional allegations with respect to the real estate involved, a residence in Longview, respondents pleaded in the alternative that on February 14, 1941, they made a written contract with Walter H. Kokernot, Jr., and his wife, whereby the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beer v. LandmanTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hall v. EdwardsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  3. Parmenter v. KellisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Spangler v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Kokernot v. GilstrapCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Plumlee v. PaddockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Academy of Skills & Knowledge, Inc. v. Charter Schools, USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
  3. Malcolm J. Henley and Mary K. Henley v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Baybank v. DiricoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Barrera v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API