Malcolm J. Henley and Mary K. Henley v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SKELTON, Judge.
This is an income tax case involving a mineral interest in land in Texas. * The plaintiffs, who are a husband and wife residing in Tyler, Smith County, Texas, seek to recover the sum of $25,024.98 (plus interest) as a partial refund of the income tax which they paid for the calendar year 1961. (The plaintiff Mary K. Henley is a party to the action only because she signed a joint income tax return with her husband for 1961.)
It is our opinion that the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover.
In 1961, the plaintiff Malcolm J. Henley was executive vice president of the Tyler…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- California-Pacific Utilities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Hurst v. Southwest Miss. Legal Services Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Stephenson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- American Smelting and Refining Company — Consolidated v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.