Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Baybank v. Dirico

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 16, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sherman, PJ.

This is an action to recover a deficiency after foreclosure on a mortgage given by defendant Joseph F. DiRico, II for a 1987 purchase of condominium investment property. Summary judgment was entered for the plaintiff, Baybank. Following the denial of his motion for reconsideration, the defendant brought this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8C appeal.

Baybank commenced this action in February, 1994, and filed and served an amended complaint in September, 1994.1 The amended complaint stated that on November 22,1987, the defendant executed a promissory note and adjustable rate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Madsen v. ErwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Page v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Symmons v. O'KeeffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arequipeno v. HallMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  2. 402 Rindge Corp. v. Ming TsaoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2002
  3. DiDonato v. MosherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  4. Reznik v. FriswellMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  5. Advo, Inc. v. BeninatiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API