Romeo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter ealled the defendants, were convicted under an indictment which charged them with a conspiracy to conduct and maintain a common nuisance at certain designated premises, by keeping, selling, etc., intoxicating liquors, and a conspiracy to unlawfully possess and sell intoxicating liquors, setting forth ten overt acts, alleged; to have been committed in pursuance thereof.
Error is assigned to the admission of the testimony of Whitney, prohibition agent, as to a conversation he had with Rossi concerning certain activities of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mayola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Tofanelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- George Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Mohave, County of v. United States Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024