Legal Opinion

Romeo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1928No. 5131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter ealled the defendants, were convicted under an indictment which charged them with a conspiracy to conduct and maintain a common nuisance at certain designated premises, by keeping, selling, etc., intoxicating liquors, and a conspiracy to unlawfully possess and sell intoxicating liquors, setting forth ten overt acts, alleged; to have been committed in pursuance thereof.

Error is assigned to the admission of the testimony of Whitney, prohibition agent, as to a conversation he had with Rossi concerning certain activities of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. Buckstaff v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. United States v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Tofanelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. George Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022
  5. Mohave, County of v. United States Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API