Legal Opinion
Langley v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 28, 2005No. 3:04 CV 7676PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on five separate motions: Defendant Daimler-Chrysler’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 70) and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 101); Defendant Debra Lobzun’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 71); Plaintiff Brenda Langley’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doe. No. 87); and Daim-lerChrysler’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, Supporting Memorandum, and Attachments (Doc. No. 103). All five motions have been fully briefed and are now decisional. The Court has…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. SkevofilaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Bassiri v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- O'Connor v. Nationwide Children's HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Avery v. Joint Twp. Dist. Mem'l Hosp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Hollar v. RJ COFFEY CUP, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.