Wall v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.
District Court, D. Montana
"In Equity. Suit by William E. Wall and another against the Anaconda Copper Mining Company and the Parrot Silver & Copper Company to avoid an executed sale of the property of the Parrot Company to the Anaconda Company.
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
This is a suit to avoid an executed sale of all the property of the defendant Parrot Company to the defendant Anaconda Company, both defendants Montana mining corporations.
Plaintiffs own 1,210 shares of 230,000 shares, 229,850 issued, the capital stock of the Parrot Company.
'I'he complaint alleges that in 1899 A. C. Burrage, William Rockefeller, H. H. Rogers, and more than 15 named “other persons,” purchased the majority of Parrot stock and at all times thereafter controlled the corporation pursuant to a conspiracy by them entered into to dissipate the company assets…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Homer v. Crown Cork and Seal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Johnson v. BALDWINSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Matteson v. ZiebarthWashington Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.