Legal Opinion
Steenberg Construction Company v. The Prepakt Concrete Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1967No. 9009Published
1Opinion of the Court
381 F.2d 768
STEENBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company of Hartford, Connecticut, a corporation, Appellants,
v.
The PREPAKT CONCRETE COMPANY, a corporation, Insurance Company of North America, a corporation, and the U. S. A. for the Use and Benefit of the Prepakt Concrete Company, Appellees.
No. 9009.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
August 3, 1967.
Rehearing Denied September 6, 1967.
Ray G. Martineau and C. Keith Rooker, Salt Lake City, Utah (Clifford L. Ashton, of Van Cott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy, Salt Lake City, Utah, with them on brief),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Zara Foster v. The Atlantic Refining Company, the Atlantic Refining Company v. Zara FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Century Refining Company v. Charles T. Hall, Charles T. Hall, Cross-Appellant v. Century Refining Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- J. T. Majors & Son, Inc. v. Lippert Bros., Inc., Lippert Bros., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. J. T. Majors & Son, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Western Transmission Corp. v. Colorado Mainline, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.