Legal Opinion

Roush v. Kartridge Pak Co.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided December 14, 1993No. 3:91-cv-30147PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION' FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, United States Magistrate . Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND. 1329

II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS. 1330

III. FACTUAL FINDINGS. 1331

IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS. 1332

A. The 90-Day Filing Period Following Receipt of the EEOC Right-to-Sue Letter — Is it Jurisdictional or is it Akin to a Statute of Limitations Subject to Equitable Tolling Principles? . 1332

1. Introduction ' 1332

2. The Early View: The 90-Day Requirement as a Jurisdictional

Prerequisite 1332

3. The United States Supreme Court Decisions…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Payan v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Iowa Lamb Corp. v. Kalene Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  3. Holmes v. NBC/GEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. McNeill v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
  5. Kane v. State of Iowa Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API