Roush v. Kartridge Pak Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION' FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BENNETT, United States Magistrate . Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND. 1329
II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS. 1330
III. FACTUAL FINDINGS. 1331
IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS. 1332
A. The 90-Day Filing Period Following Receipt of the EEOC Right-to-Sue Letter — Is it Jurisdictional or is it Akin to a Statute of Limitations Subject to Equitable Tolling Principles? . 1332
1. Introduction ' 1332
2. The Early View: The 90-Day Requirement as a Jurisdictional
Prerequisite 1332
3. The United States Supreme Court Decisions…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Payan v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Iowa Lamb Corp. v. Kalene Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Holmes v. NBC/GEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- McNeill v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Kane v. State of Iowa Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.