Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 8, 1995No. Civ. A. G-94-480PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KENT, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, brought pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 56(e). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

I. Background

This case was brought under the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (hereinafter “ADA”). On June 25, 1988, Plaintiff experienced an on-the-job injury to his back. He underwent two surgical procedures to treat a herniated lumbar disc. Plaintiff did not return to work after either surgery.

In 1990, Plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Johnnie Leonard, Sr. v. Dixie Well Service & Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Payan v. Aramark Management Services Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Fussell v. Georgia Ports AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
  3. Eber v. Harris County Hospital DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
  4. Ellison v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
  5. Dade v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API