Legal Opinion

Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. v. Tony Riney Steve Landers Emmett Jones Jack Caldwell William Gandy Leah Leonard, Cycle Center, Inc., Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1994No. 93-2197PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

The Yamaha Motor Corporation (Yamaha) appeals the district court’s order abstaining from, and dismissing without prejudice, Yamaha’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against six members of the Arkansas Motor Vehicle Commission (the Commission). Because we find that the district court erred when it abstained from exercising its jurisdiction over this action, we reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

In 1986, Cycle Center, Inc., (Cycle Center) entered into a dealer agreement (the Agreement) with Yamaha. That Agreement, which furnished the terms…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Aaron v. Target CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Patricia StroudCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. HeinemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2007
  4. Harrison Franklin v. Gary R. McCaughtry WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Arkansas Motor Vehicle CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API