Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Patricia Stroud
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from the attempt of Yamaha Motor Corporation U.S.A. (Yamaha) to open a new Arkansas dealership for its motorcycles and all-terrain vehicles. It understood that a 1997 legislative amendment had excluded this type of dealership from certain statutory application requirements, but state officials proceeded to invoke notice and hearing procedures which Yamaha believed were no longer applicable. Yamaha responded by filing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action which the district court dismissed on the basis of abstention, and Yamaha appeals. We affirm the decision to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Shafik Wassef v. Dennis TibbenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Robert Hechter Silverman v. Julie Hechter SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.