Legal Opinion

Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. Heineman

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided January 19, 2007No. 4:05CV3241PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NECivR 72.3, all parties have filed objections (filings 93 & 96) from the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (filing 90), which recommends, among other things, that I deny Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel (filing 11) and grant the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (filing 70) on the ground that this court should abstain from hearing Plaintiffs’ claims under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971).

After de novo review of the Magistrate…

2Cases cited124 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Messner v. Northshore University HealthSystemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. HENRY A. v. WilldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Connor B. Ex Rel. Vigurs v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  5. Midwest Foster Care & Adoption Ass'n v. KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API