Legal Opinion

Morrow v. MarineMax, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 17, 2010No. Civil Action 09-4223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRENAS, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiffs Floyd and Maryann Morrow seek damages under the general maritime law against Mr. Morrow’s employer MarineMax and other defendants for personal injuries that Mr. Morrow sustained on a boat off the coast of Atlantic City, New Jersey. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 1 In it, the MarineMax Defendants contend that Plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and loss of services and consortium are barred as a matter of law by the New Jersey Workmen’s Compensation Act and its so-called “exclusive remedy provision,” N.J.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. John Crane Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  2. Garner v. Phoenix Air Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Ranger v. Alamitos Bay Yacht ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025
  4. WOOLERY v. ATLANTIC CAPES FISHERIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API