Morrow v. MarineMax, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiffs Floyd and Maryann Morrow seek damages under the general maritime law against Mr. Morrow’s employer MarineMax and other defendants for personal injuries that Mr. Morrow sustained on a boat off the coast of Atlantic City, New Jersey. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 1 In it, the MarineMax Defendants contend that Plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and loss of services and consortium are barred as a matter of law by the New Jersey Workmen’s Compensation Act and its so-called “exclusive remedy provision,” N.J.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evans v. John Crane Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Garner v. Phoenix Air Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Ranger v. Alamitos Bay Yacht ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 2025
- WOOLERY v. ATLANTIC CAPES FISHERIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020