Legal Opinion
Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 12, 1993No. Court No. 88-10-00810PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Carman, Judge:
Plaintiff, Mitsubishi International Corporation, challenges the classification and liquidation of its imported merchandise *872pursuant to section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1515(a) (1988). This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1988) and, for the reasons which follow, enters judgment for plaintiff.
I. Background
A. The Continuous Steel Casting Process:
All of the subject merchandise is involved in the continuous steel casting process. In general, the continuous steel casting process converts liquid metal into solid steel slabs through…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. BruckmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- W.Y. Moberly, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Robert Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitsubishi International Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Bauerhin Technologies Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Sumitomo Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Mitsubishi International v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.