Legal Opinion

Tuckel v. Jurovaty

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 9, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The plaintiffs brought suit to recover the balance due on the sale of a television set to the defendant. They have appealed from a judgment for the defendant.

Stated briefly, the facts are these: The plaintiffs were engaged in the business of selling radio and television sets. On November 30, 1950, they sold a television set to the defendant for the agreed price of $340. The defendant paid $85 in cash, took the set and agreed to pay the balance of the purchase price within thirty days. On December 22,1950, the defendant gave to the plaintiffs’ agent an additional $85 in cash and indorsed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borst v. RuffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Bassett v. Merchants Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Kossover v. Willimantic Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Sperandeo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hospital of St. Raphael v. New Haven Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Abry Bros., Inc. v. TillmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  3. In Re Offices & Services of White Plains Plaza, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Fiorilla v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Scalise v. American Employers InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API