Legal Opinion
Lehman v. Knott
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1920PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Prom Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge. In Banc. This is an action by Lina Lehman against George C.’ Knott. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Plaintiff files motion to dismiss the appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJohns, J.
— 1. Plaintiff obtained a judgment in the court below from which the ■ defendant undertakes to appeal. The proof of service is as follows:
“State of Oregon,
County of Clackamas, — ss.
“Due and legal service of the within notice of appeal is hereby accepted in Clackamas County, Oregon, this 29th day of November, 1919.
“(Signed) Geo. C. Brownelh,
“One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff.”
There is like service of the undertaking. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal:
“For the reason that this court has not obtained jurisdiction herein in that no service of the Notice of Appeal or Undertaking on Appeal has…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Mahoney v. LinderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Johnson v. TeskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MettlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FadeleyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.