Legal Opinion

United States v. Bill Patrick Connors, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1990No. 89-35411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Bill Patrick Connors appeals the district court’s denial of his second motion to provide a copy of the trial transcript at government expense. We affirm.

A prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis on a habeas corpus petition is entitled to receive at government expense copies of court documents. 28 U.S.C. § 2250 (1982). Although Connors is indigent, he has not filed a habeas petition, and therefore is not entitled to copies of his trial transcript at government expense until he does so. See Walker v. United States, 424 F.2d 278, 278-79 (5th Cir.1970).

AFFIRMED.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jack Aaron Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fatty v. State of Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Gene Anderson v. Phil StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Orlando Michael Sample v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Kevin LewisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. RodleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003