Legal Opinion

Fatty v. State of Ariz.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1992No. 89-15998Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

967 F.2d 585

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Darrell K. FATTY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

STATE OF ARIZONA; William F. Garbarino, Judge, Superior

Court, Coconino; Melvin T. Shelley, Judge, Court of Appeal,

State of Arizona; James Duke Cameron, Judge, Arizona

Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-15998.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 23, 1992.*

Dec…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Joseph Jackson, II v. State of Arizona (Unknown) Terry, Deputy Acting Warden (Unknown) Avenenti, Deputy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Bill Patrick Connors, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API