Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2003No. 03-30003Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Arne Sverre Rodley appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his motion *932for a copy of his sentencing transcripts at government expense because he has not yet filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Because Rodley has not filed a habeas corpus petition, the district court did not err in denying his motion for a copy of his sentencing transcripts at government expense. See United States v. Connors, 904 F.2d 535, 536 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (deciding that an indigent defendant is not entitled to transcripts at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Bill Patrick Connors, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API