Legal Opinion
Gene Anderson v. Phil Stanley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1997No. 97-35436Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
132 F.3d 38
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Gene ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Phil STANLEY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 97-35436.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 15, 1997.**
Decided Dec. 18, 1997.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Franklin D. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding
Before: SNEED, LEAVY,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Raymond Trimble v. City of Santa RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Bill Patrick Connors, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990