Legal Opinion
Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 26, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-72PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KNOX, District Judge.
This is an action brought by plaintiff Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation (hereinafter Quaker State) to review and set aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission in Docket No. 36092, entitled Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company. In this action, Quaker State filed a complaint alleging that the rates charged by the railroad company (herein B&O) on shipments of petroleum products from St. Marys West Virginia to Emlenton and Farmers Valley Pennslyvania in this district were inapplicable and that a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mesarosh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Pinto Trucking Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982