Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 13, 1982No. 80-1804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

685 F.2d 687

222 U.S.App.D.C. 237

CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al., Petitioners,

v.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,

Respondents.

BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. et al., Petitioners,

v.

UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission,

Respondents.

Nos. 80-1804, 80-1843.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 26, 1982.

Decided Aug. 13, 1982.

Petitions for Review of Orders of the Interstate Commerce commission.

Michael Boudin, Washington, D. C., with whom John J. McKetta, III, Austin, Tex., Harry N. Babcock, Cleveland, Ohio, Richard W.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humko Products Division of Kraft, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co., Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., Southern Railway Co., and Georgia Railroad, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API