Legal Opinion

Roukounakis v. Messer

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 9, 2005No. 04-P-191PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The plaintiff, Laila Roukounakis, had a routine mammogram in February, 1993, and was told, after additional x-ray films were taken, that the mammogram was normal. About ten months later, in December, 1993, she began feeling fatigued and felt a nagging sensation in her left breast. She developed a tender area in her left breast in February, 1994, and consulted her primary care physician, who arranged for another mam*483mogram. The mammogram revealed a suspicious mass; an ultrasound was performed. A subsequent surgical biopsy showed a mass of four to five centimeters. The plaintiff underwent a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Harnish v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Backlund v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. FrankelColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Jandre v. Wisconsin Injured Patients & Families Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ksypka v. Malden YMCAMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
  4. Borosavage v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  5. Hall v. FrankelColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API