State Compensation Fund v. Mar Pac Helicopter Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Chief Judge.
In this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission in a workers’ compensation proceeding, the sole dispute concerns whether the compensation insurance that the petitioner carrier (hereinafter SCF) agreed to provide the respondent employer (hereinafter Mar Pac) was voidable. 1 The administrative law judge concluded that it was not because the hazard causing the actual loss was one that the SCF had agreed to cover. We set aside the award because the SCF had a statutory right to rescind its agreement to provide coverage.
In approximately July 1984, William…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Collins v. StockwellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Collins v. StockwellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Evertsen v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Madrigal v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- James River Insurance v. Hebert Schenk, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Fruge v. Amerisure Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Valley Farms, Ltd. v. Transcontinental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.