Legal Opinion

Collins v. Stockwell

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1983No. 16471-PRPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:

In 1978 Robert Collins, a licensed subcontractor, performed tile work for Diplomat Homes, Inc., a developer in Phoenix. Diplomat became insolvent prior to paying Collins for the work. As a result and pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-993, Collins recorded a timely mechanic’s lien on the property on September 21, 1978. Collins served the lien on Diplomat because it was listed as the owner of the home. Thereafter, on September 26, 1978, Collins filed an action to foreclose the lien within the six-month period required by A.R.S. § 33-998. At no time was a notice of lis pendens…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ross v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lewis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kerr-McGee Oil Industries, Inc. v. McCrayArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Chase v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. State v. SteigerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Collins v. StockwellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Escalanti v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API