Legal Opinion

Valley Farms, Ltd. v. Transcontinental Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 6, 2003No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Valley Farms, Ltd. appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees Transcontinental Insurance Company and CNA Casualty of California (collectively, Transcontinental) on the issue of misrepresentations in Valley Farms’s application for insurance. We conclude that Valley Farms had a continuing duty to update Transcontinental on claims it had made between the time it gave Transcontinental’s agent claims information and the time Transcontinental issued the policy of hazard insurance. But, because we conclude a genuine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Ronald Borden v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, Ronald Borden v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Golden Rule Insurance v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  3. Medical Protective Co. v. PangDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  4. Berneking v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Date Street Capital, LLC v. Clearcover Insurance Company ...Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API