Legal Opinion

sdv/acci, Inc. v. at & T Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 11, 2008No. 06-15860PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge CANBY; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs SDV/ACCI, Tonia Metz and Gerald Metz brought this action against AT & T and one of its employees, Margaret Roman, alleging that Ms. Roman defamed the plaintiffs in the course of her employment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants, ruling that the Metzes were not proper plaintiffs, and that the allegedly defamatory statements were conditionally privileged. It further ruled that SDV/ACCI, as the remaining plaintiff, could not defeat the privilege…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. BrekkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Dickinson v. Cosby, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Medifast, Inc. v. Barry MinkowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Burns v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  5. Dickinson v. CosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API