Medifast, Inc. v. Barry Minkow
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Plaintiffs Medifast, Inc. and Shirley MacDonald appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants (1) Tracy Coenen and Sequence, Inc.’s (collectively, “Coe-nen”), and (2) Barry Minkow and Fraud Discovery Institute, Inc. (collectively, “Minkow”) respective Motions to Strike Plaintiffs’ complaint under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Plaintiffs also appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant Robert L. Fitzpatrick’s anti-SLAPP motion as to MacDonald’s libel per se cause of action. 1 Fitzpatrick appeals the district…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Dc Comics v. Pacific Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Appel v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019