Legal Opinion

Sibley County Bank v. Crescent Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1927No. 26,253PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Appeal by the receiver of a Minnesota corporation in process of dissolution from an order sustaining the demurrers of certain stockholders to a petition for an order assessing them on their alleged -double liability. The decision below was that the corporation was exclusively for manufacturing purposes and therefore against liability under art. 10, § 3, of the constitution of Minnesota. So the single question is whether under its articles of incorporation the Crescent Milling Company could have maintained the right to conduct other than a manufacturing business against the objection of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arthur v. WilliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. First National Bank v. Winona Plow Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Senour Manufacturing Co. v. Church Paint & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Cuyler v. City Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henry v. Markesan State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. Saetre v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Ebert-Hicken Co. Inc. v. Scott-Bevier Iron Min. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. In Re Dissolution of Olivia Creamery & Produce Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Veigel v. Minneapolis Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API