Sibley County Bank v. Crescent Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Appeal by the receiver of a Minnesota corporation in process of dissolution from an order sustaining the demurrers of certain stockholders to a petition for an order assessing them on their alleged -double liability. The decision below was that the corporation was exclusively for manufacturing purposes and therefore against liability under art. 10, § 3, of the constitution of Minnesota. So the single question is whether under its articles of incorporation the Crescent Milling Company could have maintained the right to conduct other than a manufacturing business against the objection of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur v. WilliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- First National Bank v. Winona Plow Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Senour Manufacturing Co. v. Church Paint & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Cuyler v. City Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Henry v. Markesan State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Saetre v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Ebert-Hicken Co. Inc. v. Scott-Bevier Iron Min. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- In Re Dissolution of Olivia Creamery & Produce Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Veigel v. Minneapolis Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932