Legal Opinion

Ebert-Hicken Co. Inc. v. Scott-Bevier Iron Min. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1927No. 26,169PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

An application for an assessment upon the stockholders of the defendant corporation to pay the debts of the corporation was denied on the sole ground that the corporation is within the class of corporations whose stockholders are exempt from the liability imposed by art. 10, § 3, of the constitution, which reads:

“Each stockholder in any corporation, excepting those organized for the purpose of carrying on any kind of manufacturing or mechanical business, shall be liable to the amount of stock held or owned by liim.”

It is settled by a long line of decisions that the stockholders of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Anderson v. Anderson Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Cowling v. Zenith Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Sibley County Bank v. Crescent Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ebert-Hicken Co. v. Scott-Bevier Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API