Veigel v. Minneapolis Stone Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This appeal by certain stockholders from an order assessing them because of their constitutional “double liability” raises the single question whether, under art. 10, § 3, of the state constitution, the Minneapolis Stone Company, a Minnesota corporation, was organized exclusively for the carrying on of “any kind of manufacturing or mechanical business.” If it was not, applicants are subject to assessment.
The question must be answered by consideration, not of what was actually done by the corporation, but of what it was authorized to do. The general purpose clause of its certificate of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graff v. Minnesota Flint Rock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Sibley County Bank v. Crescent Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927