Legal Opinion

City of Hammond v. Conley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1986No. 3-1185A330PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs/appellees Thomas Conley, Paul Spain and William Burgess are former employees of defendant/appellant City of Hammond (City). On January 1, 1984, a new administration took office in Hammond. On December 30, 1983, the plaintiffs each received a letter signed by the mayor-elect terminating their employment as of December 31, 1983. The letters further advised: "Claims for payment of vacation should be made to the Office of the City Controller."

In January, 1984, each plaintiff filed a claim for vacation pay with the City Controller. Spain and Burgess each sought three…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Die & Mold, Inc. v. WesternIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Seavey v. Estate of FanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brewer v. Hoxie School District No. 46Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  5. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. ConeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Vanderburgh County Board of Commissioners v. RittenhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Huff v. BIOMET, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Stampco Const. Co., Inc. v. GuffeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API