Legal Opinion

Seavey v. Estate of Fanning

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1975No. 875S200PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.

This matter is before us on the petition of the appellee to transfer from the Court of Appeals, Third District, and appellant’s answer thereto urging denial of the petition for failure to raise a proper issue by the petition under Ind. R. Ap. P. 11(B) (2). Appellant’s answer correctly reflects that the petition fails to raise any of the grounds for transfer enumerated in the rule. Nevertheless, we regard the issue of the case as being of sufficient public importance to warrant our consideration, in view of conflicting decisions, and we grant transfer notwithstanding the aforementioned…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ScobieOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Krueger v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Troue v. MarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gariup Const. Co., Inc. v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Picadilly, Inc. v. ColvinIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. GreggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Herzog Contracting Corporation v. McGowen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API