Standley v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This compensation case presents two questions, one of fact relative to compensation, the other of law involving attorney fees. Claimant first contends that a previous compensable injury to his low back in June 1966 became aggravated and thus compensable under ORS 656.271. The hearing officer and the Workmen’s Compensation Board concluded that it had not and rejected the claim. On appeal the circuit court concluded. otherwise, reversed the Board and remanded the claim for appropriate action. The Fund appeals. The question presented is one of fact, which we are required to review de novo.
A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Peterson v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Lemons v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Lorentzen v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Draughon v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill LumberOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Cavins v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill LumberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.