Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill Lumber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 1982No. 79-5443, CA A20708PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the referee ordered defendant to accept claimant’s aggravation claim under ORS 656.273. The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed, finding that claimant lacked credibility and that he had failed to carry his burden of proof. Claimant appeals, contending that the record is sufficient to prove that his current low back problems are a compensable aggravation of injuries sustained in an earlier industrial accident. We reverse.

To establish a compensable aggravation claim, claimant must show by a preponderance of the evidence that his worsened condition resulted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Standley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Christensen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Lemons v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Town of Hudson v. WynottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. International Paper Co. v. ComstockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API