Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Karlinski
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
LANDAU, J.A.D.
Defendants Mark Anthony Mascitelli (Mark), a minor, and his mother Brenda Mascitelli, individually and as guardian ad litem, appeal from the award of summary judgment favorable to plaintiff Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (PRUPAC) in a declaratory judgment action. The Mascitellis’ cross-motion for summary judgment was denied, but this has not been appealed. PRUPAC sought in the action a determination that its homeowners policy issued to defendants James and Eileen Karlinski did not require it to defend or indemnify them…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Ambassador Insurance Company v. MontesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. FlanaginSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Allstate Insurance v. MalecSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Lyons v. Hartford Ins. GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- No. 93-5777, 93-5794Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Harleysville Insurance Companies v. GarittaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. CoppolaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.