Legal Opinion

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Karlinski

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 1, 1991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LANDAU, J.A.D.

Defendants Mark Anthony Mascitelli (Mark), a minor, and his mother Brenda Mascitelli, individually and as guardian ad litem, appeal from the award of summary judgment favorable to plaintiff Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (PRUPAC) in a declaratory judgment action. The Mascitellis’ cross-motion for summary judgment was denied, but this has not been appealed. PRUPAC sought in the action a determination that its homeowners policy issued to defendants James and Eileen Karlinski did not require it to defend or indemnify them…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Ambassador Insurance Company v. MontesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. FlanaginSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Allstate Insurance v. MalecSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Lyons v. Hartford Ins. GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. No. 93-5777, 93-5794Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Harleysville Insurance Companies v. GarittaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. CoppolaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API