Legal Opinion

Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance v. Coppola

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 31, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

KEEFE, J.A.D.

Defendant Peter Coppola appeals from an order granting summary judgment to plaintiff Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Merrimack). The judgment declared that Merrimack was not obligated to defend or indemnify defendant for his acts of abuse against his former wife under a homeowners policy. The issue to be decided is whether defendant’s subjective intent with respect to the consequences of his alleged abusive behavior toward his wife is relevant in determining if coverage exists under his homeowner’s policy that excludes indemnity…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bittner v. Harleysville InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  2. Priest v. RonconeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. F.S. v. L.D.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Villa Enterprises Management Ltd. v. Fed. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  5. Grabowski v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API