Legal Opinion
Susan P. Asmo v. Keane, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 18, 2006No. 05-3818PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J., (pp. 598-601), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Susan Asmo (Asmo) claimed that the defendant Keane, Inc. (Keane) terminated her employment because she was pregnant, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k), and analogous provisions of Ohio Rev.Code, Chapter 4112. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant Keane, and Asmo appealed. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the district court erred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Pram Nguyen v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Geiger v. Tower AutomotiveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Pointer v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Lindsay v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Ambrea Fairchild v. All Amer Check Cashing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.