Legal Opinion
The United States of America v. Harold Jones
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 9, 1989No. 88-3460PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
On August 2, 1987, a federal grand jury was empanelled to conduct an investigation into narcotics activity in the Southern District of Illinois. The grand jury subpoenaed Harold Jones pursuant to a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, to answer questions about this narcotics activity. At the time, Jones was serving a ten-year sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Jones’s attorney informed the United States Attorney that Jones would not testify before the grand jury unless compelled to do so. On October 14, 1987, the district court granted Jones…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings Empanelled May 1988. Appeal of Dennis FrelighCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kenneth O. LippittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings of the Special April 2002 Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- In the Matter of the Grand Jury Proceedings of December, 1989. Appeal of Dennis FrelighCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- In Re Grand Jury Proceeding. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.