Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceeding. United States v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 10, 1994No. 93-2316PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent John Doe has refused to testify before a grand jury investigating alleged organized crime figures, explaining that he was fearful of reprisals against himself and his family and was opposed on principle to providing evidence against others. The district court held respondent in civil contempt and ordered him incarcerated. It found that his proffered explanations failed to provide “just cause” for his recalcitrance, see 28 U.S.C. § 1826(a), and that incarceration was reasonably likely to induce a change of heart. On appeal, respondent now challenges this determination on procedural…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Mark Lawrence AlterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. Piemonte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. In Re Leonard L. BianchiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. United States v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  4. In Re ImpoundedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Howell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API