Doe v. McIntire
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.
The plaintiffs are legal immigrants who have been denied cash assistance benefits from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts because they have resided in the Commonwealth for less than six months. They have filed suit in this Court claiming that Massachusetts’ six-month residency requirement violates the United States and Massachusetts Constitutions. The plaintiffs now move for partial summary judgment, seeking an order from this Court that the six month residency requirement violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Part 1, Articles 1…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe v. McIntireMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001