Legal Opinion

Doe v. McIntire

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 22, 2001No. 003014FPublished

1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.

The plaintiffs, legal immigrants who have been denied cash assistance benefits from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts because they have resided in the Commonwealth for less than six months, have moved for reconsideration of this Court’s Memorandum of Decision and Order dated January 25, 2001 (“the Decision”) (12 Mass. L. Rptr. 697) allowing partial summary judgment on behalf of the defendant Commissioner. For the reasons detailed below, the plaintiffs’ request for reconsideration is DENIED.

The plaintiffs challenge this Court’s legal conclusion that, “(w]hen a state law benignly benefits only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Doe v. McIntireMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API