Legal Opinion
United States v. One Piece of Real Estate, Etc.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided August 3, 1983No. Civ. A. SA-82-CA-845 to SA-82-CA-847PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING LIENHOLDERS POST-SEIZURE CHARGES
SUTTLE, Senior District Judge.
In these consolidated forfeiture actions, the government seeks to have various parcels of real property forfeited from their legal owners because the parcels were purchased with proceeds from unlawful drug transactions. Several institutional lienholders have filed claims, seeking to recover unpaid principal, as well as post-seizure interest and other charges permitted by their notes.
The Lomas & Nettleton Company (“L & N”) is the holder of a promissory note secured by a deed of trust on 1314 Whiterock, Bexar County,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Florida Dealers and Growers Bank and Amy E. Moon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. One 1967 Chris-Craft 27 Foot Fiber Glass BoatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- T. B. Wingo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Antonia Campos, Jose Campos, Milk-O-Mat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. MageeanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1986
- United States v. Metmor Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Miscellaneous JewelryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.