Legal Opinion
United States v. Miscellaneous Jewelry
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 5, 1987No. Civ. N-86-2067, N-86-2068, N-86-2069 and N-86-2071PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NORTHROP, Senior District Judge.
This action is a forfeiture proceeding brought pursuant to the Drug Abuse Prevention Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., in which the plaintiff (“the Government”) is seeking to have the defendant property, which includes over a million dollars in cash, two large checks, two pieces of real estate and miscellaneous jewelry and electronic equipment, 1 forfeited on the theory that the property was furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance or property constituting proceeds traceable to such an exchange. See 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mendoza v. City of West CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- United States v. One Parcel of Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements Known as 116 Emerson Street, Located in ProvidenceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. One Rural LotDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1990
- United States v. 92 Buena Vista Ave., Rumson, NjDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- United States v. One 1987 Mercedes Benz 300E, VIN: WDBEA30D6HA400110 VA Tag MVI 688District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.