Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Biddle Purchasing Co. & Yung Hsing Trading Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 12, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
There are two respondents to this proceeding — Yung Hsing Trading Corporation, the contracting party, which did not appear, and Adolphe Hurst & Company, Inc., its general agent, which appeared to contest the application on its own behalf, claiming that it had not agreed to arbitrate anything. The appeal as to Adolphe Hurst & Company, Inc., was discontinued.
Adolphe Hurst & Company, Inc., as general agent for Yung Hsing Trading Corporation, made contracts under which certain walnuts were sold to plaintiff with warranties of quality. The contract provided for arbitration in New York of any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bersin v. John Boath, Junr., & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jacobs v. Zurich InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Society Milion Athena, Inc. v. Natlional Bank of GreeceNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Mastan v. Desormeau Dairy-Vend Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960