Legal Opinion

Mastan v. Desormeau Dairy-Vend Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term which denied the motion of third-party defendant, a foreign corporation, to set aside the service of the summons on the ground that the person to whom it was delivered was not defendant’s “ managing agent ” (Civ. Prae. Act, § 229, subd. 3). The test is whether the relationship is such as to justify the inference that notice given to the agent will be transmitted to the principal. (Tama v. Susquehanna Goal Co., 220 N. Y. 259; Matter of Biddle Purchasing Co. v. Yung Using Trading Corp., 238 App. Div. 264; Ameritex Development Corp. v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. In re the Arbitration between Biddle Purchasing Co. & Yung Hsing Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Zurich InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Heritage House Frame & Moulding Co. v. Boyce Highlands Furniture Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API