Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
B
Neither Humphrey's Executor nor Morrison resolves whether the CFPB Director's insulation from removal is constitutional. Start with Humphrey's Executor. Unlike the New Deal-era FTC upheld there, the CFPB is led by a single Director who cannot be described as a "body of experts" and cannot be considered "non-partisan" in the same sense as a group of officials drawn from both sides of the aisle. 295 U.S. at 624 , 55 S.Ct. 869 . Moreover, while the staggered terms of the FTC Commissioners prevented complete turnovers in agency leadership and guaranteed that there would always be some…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by654 opinions
- Hernandez Lara v. LyonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Jody Kaufmann v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- SEC v. JarkesySupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Mr. Eddie I. Sierra v. City of Hallandale Beach FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
649 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.