Legal Opinion

Choctaw Pressed Brick Co. v. Townsend

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 24, 1925No. 14907PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The plaintiff in error brought this action in the district court for injunction against the defendants in error, warden, deputy warden, and assistant deputy wax-den of ihhe state penitentiary, to-enjoin said defendants from selling “convict-made pressed brick” which do not bear the label which section 11015, Sess. Laws 1921, requires to be borne by convict-made goods. Without stating the grounds therefor, the-trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition, and plaintiff appeals to this court assigning error in sustaining the demurrer.

The substance of the material allegations in the petition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Stone v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Bynum v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. L.R. Foy Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Board of County Com'rs of Woods County v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Hershel v. University Hospital FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. BoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. State Bar v. Retail Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API